FRESH RESEARCH REPORT OF A TRACE METAL-CWD STUDY AT SASKATOON UNIVERSITY IS BEING EXPLOITED TO DISCREDIT A MISREPRESENTED VERSION OF PURDEY’S THEORY
http://www.purdeyenvironment.com/floodstudy.htmThe following article authored by Professor Peter Flood’s team at Saskatoon Uni has been circulated widely in the public domain by the likes of the USDA / DNR personnel. The officials are exploiting the findings of this study as a means of discrediting the validity of my research into the involvement of trace minerals in the origins of TSE. However, this study fails to address the key tenets of my published theory on the origins of CWD (see below for full abstract ‘Elevated silver, barium and strontium in antlers, vegetation and soils sourced from CWD cluster areas; Do Ag / Ba / Sr piezoelectric crystals represent the transmissible pathogenic agent in TSEs?’).
Whilst the results of this study do in fact inject some interesting fresh insight into our understandings of the metal-protein chemistry of TSEs – which actually supports the observations of my own trace metal studies across North American TSE / TSE-free locations in 2002/2003 ( see; abstract below) – it is a great shame that the conclusion of this article has seemingly adopted a more politically orientated tact which rejects outright the viability of any trace metal imbalance in the aetiology of TSEs. The conclusion is largely based on a misinterpretation of my own and other researchers’ published studies.
It is also a shame that many government officials, who are clearly unaware of the tenets of my hypothesis, have taken it upon themselves to disseminate this un-reviewed paper widely throughout the public domain, using it as a means of discrediting a theory which ironically is not mine.
The conclusion of the Flood study rejects any role for trace element disturbances in the origins of CWD. Such an opinion is both unscientific and premature in that it fails to take account of my actual environmental analytical observations and the relevant pathogenic mechanisms that I have proposed in my published theory on the origins of the CWD.
In this respect it is the Saskatoon research study that is deficient, since they have only analysed for the levels of six trace elements in total, which excludes the majority of the key metals like silver, barium and strontium – which have shown up at high level in my analytical studies of CWD clusters across North America in 2002/2003, in relation to CWD-free control zones. The fact that these specific rogue metal pollutants have been identified, has been presented in both my published papers and at the specific lectures that these authors’ attended ( see; abstract below ). So why has this been ignored ?
The Saskatoon conclusion also fails to grasp the relevance of one of the central tenets of my theory which indicates that it is the loss of copper from the metal binding domains on the prion protein which is the pertinent prerequisite. In this respect, it appears that the authors have not read my initial publication ( Purdey M, Medical Hypotheses 54 (2) 278-306 ) on the role of metals in the pathogenesis of TSEs ( reprints were provided to the authors when we met ); since on page 281 of this article, it is clearly depicted that the ‘copper disturbance’ prerequisite can be achieved via several different routes that do not necessarily involve a primary copper deficiency in the external environment. This pathogenic cornerstone pivots upon the loss of the five copper atoms from the octapeptide repeat region of the cellular prion protein ( Brown D, trends in Neurosci, 2001 24 (2) 69-127 ) which can be achieved in the following ways;
a. Via a primary deficiency of copper in the external environment.
b. Via environmental exposure of the organism to copper chelating chemicals such as organo dithiophosphate insecticides, molybdenum, cuprizone (a well known copper chelator which induces scrapie in lab mice )
c. Via exposure to pollutant metals, like silver, which will preferentially bind to prion protein’s metallo ligands in relation to copper, thereby displacing the copper from binding to its native domains - irrespective of the levels of available copper within the organismand external environment.
d. via exposure to chemicals which could mutate the genes that encode for the synthesis of the metallo binding ligands on prion protein.
Since the authors’ study has focused exclusively on the single facet of environmental copper deficiency as the sole means of achieving copper depletion at the prion protein, then there is no basis on which to conclude that my hypothesis is incorrect.
On the contrary, my latest publication of data collected across North American / Canadian CWD clusters and CWD-free locations ( see abstract below ) clearly indicates that the high levels of silver ( identified in the hard tissues of the deer, as well as local vegetation/soil ) could preferentially bind to the prion protein metal-domains in place of copper. This could theoretically indicate that the all important loss of copper binding to the prion protein has been achieved via the mechanism of displacement of copper from its binding domain on the prion protein rather than as a result of a primary copper deficiency in the external environment.
If this turns out to be the case, then the levels of copper in the soil, pasture, liver, brain, etc, are irrelevant in respect of the pathogenesis of the CWD strain of TSE. Furthermore, there is evidence that silver intoxications will induce symptoms of copper deficiency (Ganther H, Annals NY Acad Sci 1980 212-225 ) probably via this mechanism of displacement of copper at the copper-binding domains on various key enzyme groups.
Peter Flood’s paper also makes totally unsupported statements over the viability of the conventional ‘infectious protein-only theory’; for instance the authors state that " the abnormal prion can be passed from one animal to another causing CWD ", yet they fail to give any references that demonstrate these outlandish, scientifically inept claims . To my knowledge, there is no research paper that supports these ideas.
The authors also fail to explain how the so called protein-only 'prion' can remain 'infectious' after being heated up to 800-1000 degrees, not to mention their failure to address the myriad of other major flaws in the protein-only theory. This kind of Pavlovian-like allegiance to the current mindset, represents just another example of the scientific community assuming that the majority theory represents unquestionable 'gospel', without ever taking time out to assess the validity of the original research that initiated this misguided hypothesis in the first instance.
A POINT BY POINT CRITIQUE OF THE ‘FLOOD PAPER’ AND ITS IRRELEVANCE TO MY PUBLISHED WORK IS AS FOLLOWS :
PERSONAL REPERCUSSIONS.
As an overworked, unsupported single handed international TSE researcher and lecturer, it is very tedious to be constantly forced to spend valuable time and energy countering these kind of publications - that employ irrelevant scientific arguments as a means of discrediting my work. This happens much too frequently, where scientific teams who are understandably eager to maintain a steady inflow of grant money, feel forced to compromise their good science by moulding their results to satisfy the agenda of their paymasters – the local government departments, etc.
But the problem is that the readers of these widely circulated government papers are invariably ill informed of the relevant details of the theory under attack. So one is left with little choice but to mount a substantial counter-defence in order to rectify the myths that are being circulated surrounding your work. Or, alternatively, if you choose to ignore the challenge, you are forced to face the risk of loosing your hard won credibility, along with any future income ( lecturing, grant support ) on account of a misrepresentation of your true position. This is totally unfair, because the ever increasing financial sacrifices that I am forced to make for my research make it hard for me to continue with these types of projects. I have to meet the needs of six children who are all wanting to go to university !
In the interests of positive progress and efficient use of resources in testing for potential roles of environmental factors in TSEs, it is also ‘out of order’ that my personal input has been continually excluded from the various official forums that have debated my work over the years ( save the UK’s BSE Inquiry ). My absence from these unilaterally orientated discussions has obviously left me powerless to rectify the blatant misconceptions that are repeatedly raised in the resulting statements about my work that are circulated throughout the public domain.
Over the years various
protocols have been designed to challenge the environmental
based theories on the cause of TSEs and this has represented
a positive advance on each occasion. But the potential
capacity of each research project that has actually got
launched has been seriously compromised by the failure of the
teams to consult with myself or other field researchers over
the project’s design.
The technicians have launched an irrelevant challenge to a
misrepresented version of my work which betrays the
predetermined agenda to discredit rather than test
the hypothesis in an impartial perceptive scientific manner.
In respect of the Saskatoon team who have been fortunate enough to acquire grant funding to pursue this interesting new line of environmental research into the causes of TSEs, their money would have been better spent if they had tested the relevant tissues for the full spectrum of metals ( 50 or so ) that could potentially be involved in the pathogenesis of these grotesque diseases – for little extra above the costs which they spent for screening for six elements .
It is only by working together as a unified group of lateral thinking, cross-discipline, trans-global researchers ( involving biochemists, geochemists, geophysicists, neuropathologists, veterinarians, livestock farmers, CJD victims’ relatives etc ), that we will be able to get to the root cause of these disturbing diseases as quickly as possible.
But I feel that before we can reach this somewhat idealistic position in the way that researchers co-operate and tackle disease research from a multidisciplinary perspective, the scientific community needs to wake up and recognise that the repeated identification of a specific toxic environmental agent/s in all of the key cluster areas of a given disease may actually provide us with some valuable intelligence that will help elucidate the primary causal pathways involved in that disease.
People such as myself need to be treated with respect, rather than misrepresented, plagiarised, discarded, insulted, criminalized and then ‘bullied’ into the backstreet gutterscapes of academia. Why does such an innocent pursuit as trying to find out the cause of a disease pose such a grave threat to the establishment ? Why has my existence warranted such a sustained bout of vitriolic and inappropriate treatment from the mainstream scientific community ?
Mark Purdey 26/3/04
Abstract ( a presentation of the contents of this ‘in press’ paper were delivered at the specific lectures which the Flood team had attended in Canada;)
Elevated silver, barium and strontium in antlers, vegetation and soils sourced from CWD cluster areas; Do Ag / Ba / Sr piezoelectric crystals represent the transmissible pathogenic agent in TSEs?
Mark Purdey, High Barn Farm, Elworthy, Taunton, Somerset, TA43PX, UK.
Tel; 00 44 1984 656832. Email; TSEPurdey@aol.com.
High levels of Silver (Ag), Barium (Ba) and Strontium (Sr) and low levels of copper (Cu) have been measured in the antlers, soils and pastures of the deer that are thriving in the chronic wasting disease ( CWD ) cluster zones in North America in relation to the areas where CWD and other transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs) have not been reported. The elevations of Ag, Ba and Sr were thought to originate from both natural geochemical and artificial pollutant sources – stemming from the common practise of aerial spraying with ‘cloud seeding’ Ag or Ba crystal nuclei for rain making in these drought prone areas of North America, the atmospheric spraying with Ba based aerosols for enhancing / refracting radar and radio signal communications as well as the spreading of waste Ba drilling mud from the local oil/gas well industry across pastureland. These metals have subsequently bioconcentrated up the foodchain and into the mammals who are dependent upon the local Cu deficient ecosystems. A dual eco-prerequisite theory is proposed on the aetiology of TSEs which is based upon an Ag, Ba, Sr or Mn replacement binding at the vacant Cu/Zn domains on the cellular prion protein (PrP) / sulphated proteoglycan molecules which impairs the capacities of the brain to protect itself against incoming shockbursts of sound and light energy. Ag / Ba / Sr chelation of free sulphur within the biosystem inhibits the viable synthesis of the sulphur dependent proteoglycans, which results in the overall collapse of the Cu mediated conduction of electric signals along the PrP-proteoglycan signalling pathways; ultimately disrupting GABA type inhibitory currents at the synapses / end plates of the auditory / circadian regulated circuitry, as well as disrupting proteoglycan co-regulation of the growth factor signalling systems which maintain the structural integrity of the nervous system. The resulting Ag, Ba, Sr or Mn based compounds seed piezoelectric crystals which incorporate PrP and ferritin into their structure. These ferrimagnetically ordered crystals multireplicate and choke up the PrP-proteoglycan conduits of electrical conduction throughout the CNS. The second stage of pathogenesis comes into play when the pressure energy from incoming shock bursts of low frequency acoustic waves from low fly jets, explosions, earthquakes, etc, ( a key eco-characteristic of TSE cluster environments ) are absorbed by the rogue ‘piezoelectric’ crystals, which duly convert the mechanical pressure energy into an electrical energy which accumulates in the crystal-PrP-ferritin aggregates ( the fibrils ) until a point of ‘saturation polarization’ is reached. Magnetic fields are generated on the crystal surface, which initiate chain reactions of deleterious free radical mediated spongiform neurodegeneration in surrounding tissues. Since Ag, Ba, Sr or Mn based piezoelectric crystals are heat resistant and carry a magnetic field inducing pathogenic capacity, it is proposed that these ferroelectric crystal pollutants represent the transmissible, pathogenic agents that initiate TSE.